Credo AI CEO: U.S. Needs Safety Standards to Win the Global AI Race
Artificial intelligence has emerged as one of the most transformative technologies of our time, reshaping industries, societies, and even geopolitics. As AI accelerates, countries are locked in a race to harness its economic, strategic, and military potential. But amid the rush to dominate this new frontier, questions of safety, governance, and ethics loom larger than ever.
In this context, the CEO of Credo AI, a company specializing in responsible AI governance, recently emphasized that the United States cannot hope to lead the global AI race without establishing robust safety standards. According to her, winning the race is not just about speed—it’s about building trust, accountability, and long-term resilience in AI systems.
The call for safety standards in AI isn’t limited to government and defense—it also extends to consumer applications that directly affect young people. For example, initiatives like OpenAI’s ChatGPT for teens show how companies are starting to prioritize safety and privacy in everyday AI tools, reinforcing the idea that trust and responsibility are essential for long-term success.
This statement reflects a growing consensus that leadership in AI will not be determined solely by who develops the fastest algorithms or the most powerful chips, but also by who earns the world’s confidence in using AI responsibly.
The Current Landscape of the AI Race
AI development has become a matter of national priority across the globe. The U.S., China, and the European Union are the most prominent players, each with distinct strategies:
- United States: Driven by private-sector innovation, venture capital, and research hubs like Silicon Valley, the U.S. excels at producing groundbreaking AI models and applications.
- China: Backed by state-directed funding and long-term strategic planning, China is rapidly scaling its AI capabilities, especially in surveillance, defense, and manufacturing.
- European Union: While not always first in raw innovation, the EU is setting itself apart through regulatory leadership, with frameworks like the EU AI Act focused on safety and ethics.
Against this backdrop, the U.S. faces both opportunities and risks. While American companies dominate the cutting edge of generative AI, concerns are mounting about misuse, bias, disinformation, and safety gaps.
Credo AI’s Mission: Building Responsible AI
Credo AI positions itself at the intersection of innovation and governance. Its mission is to help organizations deploy AI systems that are not only powerful but also transparent, ethical, and accountable.
The CEO’s comments reflect this ethos: without trusted frameworks, AI adoption risks public backlash, regulatory overreach, or worse—dangerous misuse that undermines U.S. leadership. In other words, winning the AI race requires a foundation of responsibility.
Why Safety Standards Matter in AI
The call for safety standards is not just a moral appeal—it’s a strategic necessity. Several key reasons stand out:
1. Trust Drives Adoption
If businesses, governments, and citizens cannot trust AI systems, they will resist adoption. Trust comes from knowing that systems are reliable, secure, and free from harmful bias.
2. Preventing Catastrophic Risks
AI is no longer limited to automating routine tasks. It powers critical systems in healthcare, energy, finance, and defense. Without standards, failures in these areas could have devastating consequences.
3. Global Competitiveness
Countries that set the rules often set the pace. Just as the U.S. once led in shaping the rules of the internet and global finance, it now has the chance to establish itself as the leader in AI safety governance.
4. Public Confidence in Innovation
AI is surrounded by hype and fear. From job displacement to misinformation, citizens worry about its impact. Standards reassure people that their interests are protected, reducing resistance to progress.
The U.S. Challenge: Innovation Without Guardrails
One of the paradoxes of American innovation is that its speed sometimes comes at the expense of safeguards. Silicon Valley’s ethos of “move fast and break things” works well for social media apps, but it becomes dangerous when applied to technologies that can influence elections, medical diagnoses, or military operations.
While the U.S. excels at producing powerful AI models like GPT and other generative systems, its governance frameworks lag behind. In contrast, Europe is pushing forward with comprehensive AI regulations, while China integrates AI into its national strategy with strong central oversight.
This raises a critical question: can the U.S. maintain its leadership without catching up in the governance arena?
The Credo AI CEO’s Argument: Safety as Strategy
The CEO argues that safety standards are not just about risk management—they are a competitive advantage. By embedding ethics and safety into AI development, the U.S. can distinguish itself as the world’s most trusted AI provider.
Think of it as the difference between speed and endurance. Countries that chase speed without safety may achieve short-term breakthroughs but risk long-term setbacks if their systems fail or cause harm. Those that balance speed with responsibility may advance more steadily but build resilience, credibility, and global influence.
Examples of AI Risks That Demand Standards
- Bias in Decision-Making
AI used in hiring, lending, or law enforcement can unintentionally reinforce discrimination if not carefully audited. - Misinformation and Deepfakes
Generative AI can create hyper-realistic fake content that disrupts elections, markets, or social stability. - Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities
AI systems themselves can be hacked or exploited, turning them into weapons against their creators. - Autonomous Weapons
Without strict oversight, military AI could escalate conflicts unintentionally, raising ethical and strategic concerns. - Healthcare Errors
AI tools in medicine can improve diagnoses but may also lead to harmful mistakes if deployed without standards.
These examples highlight why the U.S. cannot afford a “wait and see” approach.
The Role of Government vs. Private Sector
The U.S. AI ecosystem is largely private-sector driven, which is both a strength and a weakness. While companies innovate quickly, they may lack incentives to prioritize safety unless required by standards or regulations.
The CEO of Credo AI argues for collaboration:
- Government must set the framework for safety and accountability.
- Private companies must integrate these frameworks into product development.
- Civil society and academia must provide oversight, research, and ethical guidance.
Such a multi-stakeholder approach ensures balance between innovation and responsibility.
Learning from Other Industries
AI is not the first transformative technology to raise safety concerns. Aviation, nuclear energy, and pharmaceuticals all required safety standards to ensure public trust.
- Aviation: Strict regulations made flying one of the safest forms of travel.
- Pharmaceuticals: Safety testing ensures medicines save lives instead of causing harm.
- Automobiles: Safety standards like seatbelts and airbags, once resisted, are now taken for granted.
In each case, the presence of safety standards did not slow innovation—it enabled it by increasing public confidence. AI could follow the same trajectory.
The Global Stakes
If the U.S. fails to lead on AI safety, two scenarios could unfold:
- China sets the rules
Given its aggressive AI strategy, China could shape global norms, embedding values that diverge from democratic ideals. - Fragmented standards
Different regions may develop conflicting rules, creating inefficiencies and barriers for global AI adoption.
Neither outcome favors U.S. leadership. By taking the lead on safety standards, the U.S. can establish itself as both an innovator and a rule-setter.
Building the U.S. Framework for AI Safety
Key steps the U.S. can take include:
- National AI Standards: Clear guidelines on transparency, bias mitigation, and risk assessment.
- Independent Oversight: Agencies or bodies tasked with monitoring compliance.
- Public-Private Collaboration: Joint initiatives to create sector-specific safety frameworks.
- International Cooperation: Aligning with allies to set global norms and prevent misuse.
Conclusion: Winning by Leading Responsibly
The CEO of Credo AI is right—winning the AI race requires more than cutting-edge technology. It requires trust, safety, and leadership. For the U.S., this means shifting the narrative from “move fast and win” to “move smart and lead.”
By embedding safety standards into the core of AI development, the U.S. has the opportunity to not only stay ahead in the AI race but also set the moral and strategic compass for the rest of the world.
In the end, the real victory will not be measured by who builds the most powerful AI first, but by who builds AI that humanity can trust.
One thought on “Credo AI CEO: U.S. Needs Safety Standards to Win the Global AI Race”